Sometimes a quick sum of the used bytes in DBA_SEGMENTS is not enough to find the total size of a table.
If you have Large Object type columns defined in the table, the total table size can potentially be far greater than what you'd think.
Let's look at an example.
I have two tables in two differen schemas, with the same name. The tables are identical, and they both contain a LOB column:
SQL> desc livedocs.documents Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------- ID NOT NULL NUMBER(19) VERSION NUMBER(19) DOC_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(19) TYPE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(255 CHAR) NUM_PAGES NUMBER(15) CREATED TIMESTAMP(6) LAST_CHANGED TIMESTAMP(6) CONTENTS NOT NULL BLOB
Check the tables' sizes:
SELECT OWNER,SEGMENT_NAME,SUM(BYTES)/1024/1024/1024 "table size (GB)" FROM DBA_SEGMENTS WHERE SEGMENT_NAME IN ('DOCUMENTS') AND OWNER IN ('LIVEDOCS','ARCHIVEDDOCS') GROUP BY OWNER,SEGMENT_NAME;
Result:
OWNER | SEGMENT_NAME | table size (GB) |
---|---|---|
LIVEDOCS | DOCUMENTS | 2,5 |
ARCHIVEDDOCS | DOCUMENTS | 1,875 |
Let's find the name of the LOB segments and their corresponding indexes:
(The LOB indexes are internal data structures only. See this post.)
SELECT OWNER,TABLE_NAME,SEGMENT_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,INDEX_NAME FROM DBA_LOBS WHERE TABLE_NAME='DOCUMENTS' AND OWNER IN ('LIVEDOCS','ARCHIVEDDOCS');
OWNER | TABLE_NAME | SEGMENT_NAME | COLUMN_NAME | INDEX_NAME |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARCHIVEDDOCS | DOCUMENTS | ARCHIVED_DOCS_LOB | CONTENT | SYS_IL0000123181C00008$$ |
LIVEDOCS | DOCUMENTS | LIVE_DOCS_LOB | CONTENT | SYS_IL0000194213C00009$$ |
How much space have been allocated to these LOB segments?
SELECT OWNER,SEGMENT_NAME,ROUND(SUM(BYTES)/1024/1024/1024) "LOB size (GB)" FROM DBA_SEGMENTS WHERE SEGMENT_NAME IN ( SELECT SEGMENT_NAME FROM DBA_LOBS WHERE TABLE_NAME='DOCUMENTS' AND OWNER IN ('LIVEDOCS','ARCHIVEDDOCS') ) GROUP BY OWNER,SEGMENT_NAME ;
OWNER | SEGMENT_NAME | LOB size (GB) |
---|---|---|
LIVEDOCS | LIVE_DOCS_LOB | 1256 |
ARCHIVEDDOCS | ARCHIVED_DOCS_LOB | 3642 |
Putting it together, you can list both the table and its dependent LOB segments like this:
SELECT S.OWNER "Owner",NVL(S.SEGMENT_NAME, 'TABLE TOTAL SIZE') "Segment name",ROUND(SUM(S.BYTES)/1024/1024/1024,1) "Segment size (GB)" FROM DBA_SEGMENTS S WHERE S.SEGMENT_NAME IN ('DOCUMENTS') AND S.OWNER IN ('LIVEDOCS','ARCHIVEDOCS') OR S.SEGMENT_NAME IN ( ( SELECT L.SEGMENT_NAME FROM DBA_LOBS L WHERE L.TABLE_NAME = 'DOCUMENTS' AND L.OWNER = S.OWNER AND L.OWNER in ('LIVEDOCS','ARCHIVEDOCS') ) ) GROUP BY S.OWNER,ROLLUP(S.SEGMENT_NAME) ORDER BY 1,2,3;
The resulting listing is:
Owner | Segment name | Segment size (GB) |
---|---|---|
ARCHIVEDDOCS | ARCHIVED_DOCS_LOB | 3642,4 |
ARCHIVEDDOCS | DOCUMENTS | 1,9 |
ARCHIVEDDOCS | TABLE TOTAL SIZE | 3644,3 |
LIVEDOCS | DOCUMENTS | 2,5 |
LIVEDOCS | LIVE_DOCS_LOB | 1255,9 |
LIVEDOCS | TABLE TOTAL SIZE | 1258,4 |
Addendum, 2025-02-06:
With assistance from Chat GPT, I realized that a better query would be to use named subqueries, or CTEs (Common Table Expressions). They can be built using the WITH-clause in SQL, and referred to in the main query:
set lines 200 col OWNER format a30 col TABLE_NAME format a30 col TABLE_SIZE_GB format 99 col LOB_SEGMENT_NAME format a30 col LOB_COLUMN_NAME format a30 col LOB_DATA_TYPE format a30 col LOB_SIZE_GB format 999 BREAK ON OWNER WITH -- CTE to get the tables with LOB objects lob_tables AS ( SELECT DISTINCT TABLE_NAME, OWNER FROM DBA_TAB_COLUMNS WHERE OWNER = 'SCOTT' AND DATA_TYPE IN ('NCLOB', 'BLOB', 'RAW' ) AND TABLE_NAME NOT LIKE 'BIN$%' ), -- CTE to get LOB segment names with their corresponding table and column names lob_segments AS ( SELECT DISTINCT L.OWNER, L.TABLE_NAME, L.SEGMENT_NAME AS LOB_SEGMENT_NAME, C.COLUMN_NAME AS LOB_COLUMN_NAME, C.DATA_TYPE AS LOB_DATA_TYPE FROM DBA_LOBS L JOIN DBA_TAB_COLUMNS C ON L.TABLE_NAME = C.TABLE_NAME AND L.COLUMN_NAME = C.COLUMN_NAME WHERE L.OWNER = 'SCOTT' ), -- CTE to get the table size in GB table_sizes AS ( SELECT S.OWNER, S.SEGMENT_NAME AS TABLE_NAME, ROUND(SUM(S.BYTES)/1024/1024/1024, 1) AS TABLE_SIZE_GB FROM DBA_SEGMENTS S WHERE S.OWNER = 'SCOTT' AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM lob_tables LT WHERE LT.TABLE_NAME = S.SEGMENT_NAME) GROUP BY S.OWNER, S.SEGMENT_NAME ), -- CTE to get the LOB size in GB lob_sizes AS ( SELECT L.OWNER, L.TABLE_NAME, L.SEGMENT_NAME AS LOB_SEGMENT_NAME, ROUND(SUM(S.BYTES)/1024/1024/1024, 1) AS LOB_SIZE_GB FROM DBA_LOBS L JOIN DBA_SEGMENTS S ON L.SEGMENT_NAME = S.SEGMENT_NAME AND L.OWNER = S.OWNER WHERE L.OWNER = 'SCOTT' GROUP BY L.OWNER, L.TABLE_NAME, L.SEGMENT_NAME ) -- Final query to combine everything SELECT TS.OWNER, TS.TABLE_NAME, TS.TABLE_SIZE_GB, LS.LOB_SEGMENT_NAME, LS.LOB_COLUMN_NAME, LS.LOB_DATA_TYPE, LZ.LOB_SIZE_GB FROM table_sizes TS JOIN lob_segments LS ON TS.OWNER = LS.OWNER AND TS.TABLE_NAME = LS.TABLE_NAME JOIN lob_sizes LZ ON LS.OWNER = LZ.OWNER AND LS.LOB_SEGMENT_NAME = LZ.LOB_SEGMENT_NAME ORDER BY TS.OWNER, TS.TABLE_NAME, LS.LOB_SEGMENT_NAME;This gives you a practical row-by-row view of everything you need to know about the LOB segments:
OWNER | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_SIZE_GB | LOB_SEGMENT_NAME | LOB_COLUMN_NAME | LOB_DATA_TYPE | LOB_SIZE_GB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCOTT | TABLE1 | 0 |
SYS_LOB0003064134C00015$$ | MYCOL1 | NCLOB | 0 |
TABLE1 | 0 |
SYS_LOB0003064134C00028$$ | MYCOL2 | NCLOB | 0 |
|
TABLE2 | 0,2 |
SYS_LOB0003064148C00005$$ | MYCOL1 | NCLOB | 1 |
|
TABLE2 | 0,2 |
SYS_LOB0003064148C00017$$ | MYCOL2BLOB | BLOB | 0 |
|
TABLE3 | 0,2 |
SYS_LOB0003064159C00004$$ | MYCOL1 | NCLOB | 237 |
|
TABLE3 | 0,1 |
SYS_LOB0003064143C00003$$ | MYCOL1 | NCLOB | 0 |
You need to move the OR
ReplyDeleteSELECT S.OWNER "Owner",NVL(S.SEGMENT_NAME, 'TABLE TOTAL SIZE') "Segment name",ROUND(SUM(S.BYTES)/1024/1024/1024,1) "Segment size (GB)"
FROM DBA_SEGMENTS S
WHERE S.OWNER IN ('LIVEDOCS','ARCHIVEDDOCS')
AND (S.SEGMENT_NAME IN ('DOCUMENTS')
OR S.SEGMENT_NAME IN (SELECT L.SEGMENT_NAME FROM DBA_LOBS L WHERE L.TABLE_NAME = 'DOCUMENTS' AND L.OWNER = S.OWNER)
)
GROUP BY S.OWNER,ROLLUP(S.SEGMENT_NAME)
ORDER BY 1,2,3;
.. As you will find out if you change the OWNER name
ReplyDeleteLate answer, but nevertheless...thanks for the suggestion :-)
Delete